JPMorgan entrera dans Bitcoin à un moment donné

Le coprésident confirme que „JPMorgan entrera dans Bitcoin à un moment donné“.

Bien que la demande de ses propres clients ne soit pas encore là, Daniel Pinto est convaincu que JPMorgan investira dans le bitcoin „à un moment donné“.

L’influente banque d’investissement américaine JPMorgan Chase devra tôt ou tard investir dans Bitcoin (BTC), selon son propre coprésident actuel.

S’adressant à CNBC aujourd’hui (vendredi), l’exécutif a déclaré que l’entrée de JPMorgan et le moment de son entrée dans Bitcoin dépendront avant tout de la Crypto Trader demande des clients de la banque d’investissement. Bien que cette demande soit actuellement insuffisante, M. Pinto s’est dit confiant :

„Si, au fil du temps, elle devient une classe d’actifs utilisée par tous les investisseurs et gestionnaires d’actifs, nous devrons alors y entrer à un moment donné. Je ne vois pas encore de demande pour cela, mais je suis sûr que cela viendra un jour“.

Les derniers commentaires de Pinto arrivent à un moment où l’on entend des rumeurs sur l’intérêt croissant des banques d’investissement pour Bitcoin. Par exemple, Troy Rohrbaugh, le responsable des marchés internationaux chez JPMorgan, a admis lors d’une conférence interne de Zoom que de plus en plus d’employés s’interrogent sur les projets de leur entreprise concernant Bitcoin. À cet égard, Pinto serait ouvert à la cryptocarte, la principale monnaie du marché, depuis un certain temps.

Cet intérêt soudain est cependant ironique dans un sens, car le PDG Jamie Dimon est en fait connu pour son attitude dédaigneuse envers Bitcoin

En 2017, par exemple, ce dernier avait encore qualifié le leader du marché de la cryptographie de „canular“ qui pouvait au mieux être comparé à la „manie des tulipes“. À cette époque, le Bitcoin était encore à 3 500 dollars US, puis quelques mois plus tard, la cryptocarte a atteint son ancien record de 20 000 dollars US.

Bien qu’un effondrement prolongé ait suivi, Bitcoin a réussi à dépasser la capitalisation boursière de JPMorgan en novembre 2020, lorsqu’elle a créé sa propre valeur marchande de 352 milliards de dollars. Peu avant cela, Dimon avait de nouveau critiqué la cryptocouronne.

De leur côté, les analystes de JPMorgan ont envoyé des signaux mitigés ces derniers mois. En octobre 2020, par exemple, certains experts de la firme avaient prédit un doublement, voire un triplement à long terme du prix du bitcoin, ce à quoi leurs collègues John Normand et Federico Manicardi ont rétorqué un peu plus tard que le bitcoin était la couverture la moins fiable de toutes.

Bitcoin is neither money nor the “new gold”, but a speculative asset

Bitcoin is a medium of exchange because it is a peer-to-peer electronic system, but it is very inefficient.

Bitcoin is a better fiat currency or an alternative to cash, but it’s not cash yet.

JP Morgan said: „Gold is real money, the rest is decree money.“

In short, Bitcoin is the new “fiat currency” or the new “liquid” of millennials. The only asset that can be called “silver” in the long term is gold.

What is money?

In Chapter IV of his major work “The Wealth of Nations” (1776), Adam Smith, considered the father of modern political economy, describes precisely the technical definition of money. Money is basically defined as a unit of account, a means of payment and a store of value.

Adam Smith explains how gold quickly became the standard currency. In addition to being a scarce resource, the chemical element gold (Au) is immutable over time. Subsequently, its physical appearance and malleability popularized it as a universally recognized form of money.

Bitcoin: is it money?

My simple and categorical answer is: no. In its current form, Bitcoin fails to be money on almost every level:

Account unit

Bitcoin is not a unit of accounting because the benchmark value of 1 BTC in 2009 is absolutely different from that of 1 Bitcoin today. Bitcoin cannot be used as an accounting measure, as the “meaning” of 1 BTC a few years ago is drastically different from that of 1 BTC today.

Payments with Bitcoin

Very few goods and services are priced in Bitcoin because to reflect their value, they would have to constantly change in price or incur significant accounting risk. Generally, goods and services that “accept” bitcoin, do not accept BTC as a unit of account, but display a price in local currency and “can be paid for with their bitcoin equivalence”.

Store of value

Bitcoin is not a store of value because its fluctuation is very independent of inflation indicators. On the contrary, it tends to fluctuate on the basis of speculation with large variations in purchasing power from day to day. Bitcoin suffers from extreme volatility:

For example, in 2009 you could mine a Bitcoin for pennies on the dollar of electricity cost, say $ 0.05. As of December 2017, the price of Bitcoin was $ 19,166.

Do not confuse: “price appreciation and speculation” with “store of value”.

In January 2018, a month after the peak in December 2017, however, Bitcoin was priced at $ 9,192. As of December 2018, it stood at $ 3,194.

In the long run, Bitcoin has not been proven to be a store of value. It even showed the opposite, being an asset with price instability and high volatility.

I would not recommend anyone to put all of their savings, rent, or money in Bitcoin as it is not possible to know if the value of BTC will remain stable in one way or another.
Bitcoin is above all a speculative asset.

Bitcoin as a payment method

Bitcoin is a medium of exchange because it is a peer-to-peer electronic system, but it turns out to be very poorly performing.

Visa and Mastercard Bitcoin

Bitcoin can execute an average of 4 transactions per second. By comparison, Mastercard or Visa systems are capable of executing 24,000 transactions per second. In terms of medium of exchange, it is therefore much inferior to current payment systems, although it is a new technology.

Is BTC collectible?

Bitcoin’s new price discovery process suffers from a lack of transparency in the stock market order books (many of which are unregulated) and a lack of liquidity. This is because Bitcoin is concentrated in the hands of only a few ( 2% of wallets control 95% of all bitcoin).

Bitcoin is therefore prone to sudden drops due to the lack of simultaneous buy and sell orders.

Agora é arriscado para as instituições não alocar para Bitcoin, diz CoinShares CSO Meltem Demirors

O diretor de estratégia da CoinShares Meltem Demirors alerta que agora é arriscado para os investidores institucionais não ter Bitcoin em sua carteira.

De que a besteira em torno da Bitcoin

Em uma entrevista com a CNBC, o executivo da empresa de gestão de ativos digitais aborda a preocupação de que a besteira em torno da Bitcoin (BTC) tem um limite de tempo, e que, eventualmente, reguladores como a Secretária do Tesouro dos EUA, Janet Yellen, irão reprimir a indústria de criptografia.

„Acho que os comentários de Janet Yellen foram bastante matizados, há uma sopa de alfabeto de agências de três letras que já regulamentam a indústria de Bitcoin. Acho que há esta concepção errada de que a Bitcoin não está regulamentada, o que é certamente falso. Nós gastamos muito tempo em conformidade em nossa organização, mas veja, o que eu acho que está acontecendo em 2020, foi um risco para os investidores alocarem para a Bitcoin. Em 2021, é um risco não alocar para a Bitcoin.

E não são apenas os investidores, são as empresas. A MicroStrategy está subindo na parte de trás de sua alocação para a Bitcoin. Ela mais do que dobrou suas reservas de tesouraria devido a sua alocação. Eles acabam de sediar um evento com mais de mil tesoureiros corporativos presentes e também acho que agora temos os Estados-nação começando a olhar seriamente para o papel que a Bitcoin poderia potencialmente desempenhar no futuro de suas economias“.

O interesse institucional está liderando o Bitcoin

Demirors acrescenta que, desta vez, o interesse institucional está liderando o Bitcoin bull run charge, enquanto os comerciantes de varejo estão mais concentrados em ativos criptográficos menores e moedas meme.

„Muito do interesse no Bitcoin vem das instituições. Quando olhamos para as tendências do lado comercial, do lado do produto estruturado onde operamos e administramos US$ 4 bilhões em ativos para nossos clientes, muitos dos influxos vêm de instituições que estão alocando através de produtos ou fundos negociados em bolsa de valores. Há a participação do varejo, mas não está nem perto do que vimos em 2017.

Onde vemos a participação do varejo é em coisas como Dogecoin (DOGE) e outros tipos de moedas criptográficas menores de mercado que se prestam mais à ‚memeficação‘ e ao que chamamos de ‚meme coins‘ ou ‚meme stocks‘, se você olhar o GameStop e o AMC. Realmente o que está impulsionando o Bitcoin, na minha opinião, é a mudança fundamental no sentimento. Ray Dalio está falando sobre isso, BlackRock está alocando para ele, Guggenheim está alocando. Todos os principais alocadores estão agora entrando“.

More than 80% of the altcoins stars of 2018 are still at -90% of their ATH

Numbers to remember in the middle of a bull run. A recent analysis by Messari shows that the altcoins stars of the bull run of 2018 have still not returned to their previous levels, by far … A consecration for Bitcoin (BTC) and Ether (ETH)?

2018 star altcoins are far from their all-time highs (ATH)

Analyst Matt Casto shared this data from Messari on Twitter. The analysis firm has compiled a list of altcoins that hit their all-time high, or „ATH“, in 2018 , in order to compare their prices. And for the vast majority, the sudden fall they experienced has still not been caught up:

“ Holding assets that hit their record over 3 years ago is turning out to be a missed opportunity to deploy capital. There is a reason why 83% of assets peaked in January 2018 are now swapped between ed to -90% of ATH . “

A good example is Neo (NEO). Bitcoin Legacy particularly favored in 2017 and 2018, it reached its highest price, at nearly $ 200, on January 15, 2018. And today, although it shows an increase of +125% over one year, it is not worth more than about $ 25 , a drop of -87%. Stellar (XLM) managed to maintain its place in the top 10 cryptocurrency by capitalization, but its price also never reached its all-time high, at 0.87 dollars. Altcoin is trading this morning for $ 0.29, a level 66% lower.

In 2021, a consolidation of “big” projects?

Beyond showing the risks inherent in cryptocurrency trading, this progression also indicates that the flagship projects have tended to consolidate in recent years, to the detriment of the altcoins that swarmed in 2017. This is also what Pantera Capital reported, by predicting a Bitcoin price of 115,000 dollars : the market has concentrated, and this benefits the largest cryptocurrency.

As of December 31, 2017, BTC represented 39% of the cryptocurrency market cap. In January 2021, it represented 72% , largely crushing the capitalization of altcoins. In front of him, only Ether (ETH) manages to resist, by gaining 14% of the capitalization. It is even progressing – it was only 12% in 2017.

Altcoins are struggling to find their ATH

But for others, it is quite the opposite. XRP represented 15% of the crypto market cap in 2017 and this share drops to 1% at the start of January 202 1. Bitcoin Cash (BCH) goes from 7% to 1%, and the share of other altcoins goes from 25% to only 10%.

Bitcoin altcoins breakdown Pantera Capital

The question we can therefore ask ourselves is: will the tokens in vogue at the moment, in particular those linked to decentralized finance (DeFi), will experience the same fate? For some analysts, the projects they are linked to are more solid, but for others, a “crypto winter” could once again arise in this particular area of ​​cryptocurrencies. Case to follow!

Das neue US-Konjunkturpaket im Wert von 900 Milliarden US-Dollar unterstreicht die Stärke von Bitcoin (Stellungnahme)

Die USA haben ein weiteres Konjunkturpaket im Wert von 900 Milliarden US-Dollar durchgeführt. Dies unterstreicht einige der Vorteile von Bitcoin als hartes Geld.

Der US-Senat hat ein neues Konjunkturpaket im Wert von fast 900 Milliarden US-Dollar genehmigt, darunter 300 Milliarden US-Dollar für kleine Unternehmen und Direktzahlungen von bis zu 600 US-Dollar für amerikanische Erwachsene. Angesichts des Gesamtbetrags der wirtschaftlichen Entlastung von mehr als 3 Billionen US-Dollar seit Beginn der COVID-19-Pandemie bleibt die Frage, ob diese Entwicklungen eine versehentliche Förderung von Bitcoin darstellen.

Eine neue US-Wirtschaftserleichterung von 900 Mrd. USD

Als der unerwartete Ausbruch der COVID-19-Pandemie Anfang dieses Jahres die westliche Welt infiltrierte, leiteten die meisten Länder vollständige Sperren ein, um die Ausbreitung des Virus zu bekämpfen. Die unbeabsichtigten Folgen schadeten jedoch der Weltwirtschaft, den Unternehmen und den persönlichen Finanzen der Menschen.

Als das nach nominalem BIP größte Land der Welt beschlossen die USA, ihren Bürgern zu helfen, indem sie im März einen massiven Cares Act in Höhe von 2,2 Billionen US-Dollar unterzeichneten. Einige Monate später sind die Folgen des Virus jedoch nicht verschwunden, und der US-Senat begann mit der Erörterung eines weiteren Abkommens, das offiziell wurde .

Der von den Republikanern kontrollierte Senat stimmte mit 92 zu 6 für dieses zweitgrößte wirtschaftliche Hilfspaket in der Geschichte der USA. Das von den Demokraten kontrollierte Haus stimmte 359-53 dafür. Präsident Donald Trump muss das Gesetz noch unterzeichnen.

Das Paket beinhaltet 300 Milliarden US-Dollar an Erleichterungen für Kleinunternehmen, eine neue Runde von Direktzahlungen von bis zu 600 US-Dollar für amerikanische Erwachsene und eine wöchentliche Aufstockung der Arbeitslosenversicherung um 300 US-Dollar bis Mitte März 2021.

„Die gute Nachricht ist, dass dies ein sehr, sehr schneller Weg ist, um Geld in die Wirtschaft zu bringen. Die Leute werden dieses Geld Anfang nächster Woche sehen. “ – sagte US-Finanzminister Steven Mnuchin.

Wird Bitcoin am meisten davon profitieren?

Während die Regierung ihren Bürgern mit diesen Hilfspaketen helfen will, hat der erhöhte USD-Druck die Reservewährung der Welt zu einer Abwertung veranlasst. Allein seit März hat der Dollar gegenüber dem Euro über 10% an Wert verloren.

Zahlreiche prominente Ökonomen warnten davor, dass diese Maßnahmen letztendlich zu hohen Inflationsraten und dem Niedergang des Greenback führen würden. Peter Schiff ging weiter und sagte, dass selbst eine Hyperinflation nicht ausgeschlossen sei.

Daher nutzte die Cryptocurrency-Community die Gelegenheit, um einen der wichtigsten Unterschiede zwischen Fiat-Währungen und Bitcoin hervorzuheben. Während die Regierungen zeigten, dass sie mit einem Wimpernschlag neues Geld drucken können, hat die primäre Kryptowährung einen begrenzten Vorrat an 21 Millionen Münzen, die jemals existieren werden.

Die Community hat diesen großen Unterschied jedoch immer hervorgehoben. Was in dieser Situation überzeugender war, war, dass prominente traditionelle Investoren außerhalb der Kryptoindustrie dies bemerkten und damit begannen, Mittel in BTC zu investieren.

Der Hedgefonds-Manager Paul Tudor Jones III gehörte zu den Ersten. Kurz darauf folgte Stanley Druckenmiller. Unternehmen und Institutionen wie MicroStrategy, Ruffer Investment, MassMutual , One River Asset Management, Guggenheim und andere auch.

Sie argumentierten, dass BTC als Absicherung gegen die Politik der Regierungen dienen könnte, und verglichen es mit dem ultimativen Wertvorrat – Gold.

Infolgedessen wird es interessant sein zu verfolgen, ob das neueste Konjunkturpaket Bitcoin in gleicher Weise beeinflusst und noch prominentere Namen dazu bringt, sich anzusammeln.

Blackrock CEO changes opinion on Bitcoin

Blackrock CEO changes opinion on Bitcoin – BTC questions US dollar

During a conversation with Mark Carney, a former governor of the Bank of England, at the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), BlackRock CEO Larry Fink raised the possibility that Bitcoin could eventually become a BitQT global market, CNBC reports.

„Bitcoin has caught the attention and imagination of many people. Still untested, rather small market compared to other markets. You see these huge movements every day … it is a thin market. Can it develop into a global market? Possibly“.

Already in October 2017 Fink had called Bitcoin the „Money Laundering Index“:

Bitcoin only shows you how great the demand for money laundering is in the world. That is all it is.

In November 2018 he claimed that the largest crypto currency was not legitimate:

I don’t feel that any government will allow it if it doesn’t know where the money is going.

Fink’s turn at Bitcoin came after Blackrock CIO Rick Rieder said that the world’s largest crypto currency could „to a large extent“ replace gold.

BTC becomes the financial product of the big

The $7.43 trillion asset manager already has a stake in Bitcoin through the business intelligence company MicroStrategy, which holds 38,250 BTC. Blackrock Fund Advisors owns 1,072,819 shares, which are currently valued at $179.2 million.

We have seen a similar career path from the CEO of JP Morgan. For years, he has accused Bitcoin of fraud or the like. In the meantime, JP Morgan recommends to hold part of the portfolio in BTC.

This trend will not abate. More and more people understand the importance of the rare asset. Although there will be short to medium term speculation even with the big ones, the direction is clear.

Bitcoin vs. US dollar

According to Fink, the BTC and other crypto currencies also question the future of the US dollar as the world’s reserve currency.

He believes that Bitcoin makes the US dollar „less relevant“ to international owners.

This is mainly due to differences in monetary policy. At Bitcoin, the supply of new BTCs is becoming increasingly scarce and the maximum number is limited. With fiat currencies there is no maximum limit and more and more are being created.

Bitcoin does not have to compete against the US dollar. The strong inflation of the US dollar will automatically flush people into BTC. Prepare yourself for the digital money revolution.

Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto is said to have been a Londoner according to the latest analysis

A new perspective on an old investigation may shed light on the whereabouts of Satoshi Nakamoto, the creator of Bitcoin (BTC).

At the very least, it should shed light on his whereabouts while he was working on Bitcoin.

A recent report has found that London was the most likely place where Satoshi Nakamoto worked on Crypto Bull scam between 2008 and 2010.

Was the inventor of Bitcoin Londoner?

The author of the report, Doncho Karaivanov, reviewed several factors to justify the conclusion. These included an analysis of the time stamps of Satoshi’s published materials, his use of regional colloquialisms and spelling, and the fact that the Times‘ headline embedded in the Genesis block was specific to the English print version of the magazine.

The idea that Satoshi was British is not new. Hundreds of journalists, sniffer dogs and investigators have thoroughly examined the traces of the activities of the creator of Bitcoin and searched the Internet for clues that lead to its origins. But this latest report in The Chain Bulletin provides additional information to previous analyses. Among other things, it highlights the likelihood that Satoshi must have been referring to the print edition of the Times when he encoded the now famous January 3, 2009 headline in the Genesis block of Bitcoin.

Only the print edition of the Times, which is distributed in England, used the headline „Chancellor on the edge of second bailout for banks“, while the online edition included the Chancellor’s name in the headline. The US edition of the newspaper did not contain the story at all.

Karaivanov analyzed reader data, which showed that about 43% of the Times‘ readership is based in London. This data, combined with the fact that London is the largest financial center in the world, makes it very likely that Satoshi could have lived in London between 2008 and 2010.
Time stamps can provide information about Satoshi’s stay

Karaivanov’s analysis of time-stamped material posted by Satoshi (including postings on Bitcointalk, emails sent to the early developers of Bitcoin, and commits to the Bitcoin repository on SourceForge) provides additional evidence that Satoshi may have resided in the GMT (UK) time zone. However, he concedes that Satoshi’s pattern of posting could also reflect someone who lived in the EST (US East Coast) or PST (US West Coast) time zones.

Among the time zones that were completely excluded were those that included Japan (where Satoshi is said to have come from according to his P2P Foundation profile) and Australia, which, according to Karaivanov, „was not even remotely possible“ unless Satoshi was „a vampire“.
Is the search for Satoshi dangerous for Bitcoin?

The statement that Satoshi probably lived in London between 2008 and 2010 is not relevant to everyone. For example, a Reddit user commented on the findings that Satoshi was in London while working on Bitcoin with the following words:

In another breaking news story, Santa Claus may have been living at the North Pole while working on toys for infants.

Moreover, not everyone in the Bitcoin industry is interested in uncovering Satoshi’s origins or identity. On the contrary, some even consider it counterproductive for Bitcoin and its entire movement.

One person is always a target, and opponents might take advantage of that to try to possibly undermine the whole idea behind Bitcoin. In addition, Adam Back, CEO of Blockstream, noted that it would be unwise for Satoshi to reveal himself publicly. Blockstream’s position is that Satoshi’s identity should not be speculated upon, as the activity „violates the ideals of Cypherpunk.

Bitcoin On-Chain Metrics Soletra Problemas com a quebra do BTC $15K

Bitcoin se desligou do resto do mercado de moedas criptográficas, mas a festa dos touros pode em breve chegar ao fim.

Principais tomadas de decisão

  • Bitcoin subiu mais de 10% nos últimos três dias à medida que os investidores se preocupavam com as eleições nos EUA.
  • Agora que o BTC está próximo de US$ 15.000, várias métricas na cadeia aconselham a adotar a abordagem de precaução.
  • Embora haja pouca ou nenhuma resistência pela frente, um pico na pressão de venda poderia fazer com que os preços voltassem a US$ 13.800.

Bitcoin tem estado em lágrimas nos últimos dias, quebrando novos máximos anuais. Mas à medida que os investidores se apressam para comprar ordens e um estado de FOMO, o BTC se aproxima de uma „zona de perigo“.

O Bitcoin não enfrenta resistência à frente

Bitcoin foi capaz de encolher todos os medos, incertezas e dúvidas em torno da eleição nos EUA e passou a ser parabólico.

A moeda principal da criptocracia subiu mais de 10% nos últimos dias, enquanto os americanos votaram. Como os preços estão próximos do limiar de 15.000 dólares, há p

Embora a moeda criptográfica pioneira pareça estar pronta para altas mais altas, os grandes investidores estão aproveitando a ação do preço ascendente para reservar lucros.

As baleias obtêm lucros

O gráfico de distribuição do titular da Santiment registrou um pico significativo na pressão de venda por trás da Bitcoin enquanto os preços estavam subindo. O número de endereços com 1.000 a 10.000 BTC caiu em quase 1,3% nas últimas duas semanas.

Cerca de 28 baleias deixaram a rede ou redistribuíram suas fichas durante este curto período. A queda repentina é significativa quando se considera que esses investidores detêm entre US$ 15 milhões e US$ 150 milhões de Bitcoin.

Se as ordens de venda continuarem a se acumular ao ritmo atual, os preços provavelmente cairão em direção ao suporte de US$ 13.800. Os coortes da IOMAP revelam que mais de 1 milhão de endereços compraram mais de 760.000 BTC em torno deste nível de preços.

Esta barreira de fornecimento maciço pode ter força para manter os preços em queda no caso de uma venda. oucas paredes significativas de suprimento pela frente, impedindo que a BTC avance mais.

O índice Valor de Mercado a Valor Realizado (MVRV) acrescenta credibilidade ao panorama pessimista. Cada vez que o MVRV subiu acima de 8,9% durante o ano passado, surgiu uma oportunidade de venda.

Este indicador entrou recentemente na „zona de perigo“ e está atualmente pairando em torno de 13,5%. Níveis tão altos sugerem que a tendência de crescimento da Bitcoin está chegando ao esgotamento. Portanto, é imperativo prestar muita atenção ao nível de apoio de 14.600 dólares.

O corte deste obstáculo de preço confirmará a perspectiva pessimista e provavelmente levará a uma correção em direção a $13.800.

De fato, o modelo „IntoTheBlock’s In/Out of the Money Around Price“ (IOMAP) revela que a única resistência considerável à frente está entre $16.240 e $16.700.

Aqui, quase 100.000 endereços haviam adquirido anteriormente mais de 80.000 BTC.

Commenti miliardari sul futuro del Bitcoin e dell’Etereum

Il leggendario gestore di hedge fund Paul Tudor Jones dice che il Bitcoin potrebbe essere l’equivalente dell’oro digitale in 20 anni e che „il contante potrebbe essere sparito“.

Paul Tudor Jones, miliardario americano e gestore di hedge fund, è l’ultima cifra a commentare il futuro di Bitcoin e altcoins.

In un’intervista a Yahoo Finance, Jones, che possiede alcuni BTC, ha ammesso di non essere un esperto di Bitcoin. Si è anche astenuto dal fare grandi previsioni sul prezzo potenziale delle valute madri. Tuttavia, ha avanzato un paio di nozioni che meritano di essere prese in considerazione quando si tratta di BTC e di Ethereum.

In primo luogo, ha sottolineato che, a suo parere, „500 miliardi sono il limite di mercato sbagliato in un mondo in cui si hanno 90 trilioni di dollari di capitale e Dio solo sa quanti trilioni di monete fiat“. Ha aggiunto che è il limite di mercato sbagliato (BTC) rispetto all’oro, che secondo lui ha un limite di mercato da 8 a 9 trilioni.

Ha anche notato che Bitcoin Revolution gli ricorda molto le azioni internet del 1999. In particolare, Jones ha tracciato un parallelo osservando che all’epoca nessuno sapeva come sarebbe andata a finire quando internet era agli inizi. Ha spiegato che nessuno sapeva come valorizzare internet a causa del mondo di possibilità che esisteva.

Ha continuato dicendo che tra vent’anni tutti useranno una qualche forma di moneta digitale. Jones dice che è probabile che ogni sovrano (paese) avrà la sua forma di moneta digitale e che il suo uso sarà comune. Ha continuato dicendo: „Il denaro contante potrebbe non esserci più“.
Ulteriori informazioni

Mentre Jones non era sicuro di come sarebbe stato lo spazio di criptaggio in 20 anni, ha azzardato l’ipotesi che potesse assomigliare al complesso dei metalli, ma invece di specifici metalli preziosi, avresti avuto specifiche crittografie preziose.

Detto questo, egli pensa che alla fine il Bitcoin potrebbe diventare l’oro digitale – un’opinione popolare all’interno del cripto-verso. L’etereum, invece, potrebbe essere trasformato in un metallo industriale come il rame, per esempio. Di conseguenza, ci saranno due tipi di crittovalute: quelle preziose e quelle industriali.

Una tale previsione non ha lusingato tutti all’interno della comunità dei crittografi. Alcuni utenti di Twitter hanno prontamente criticato la previsione di Tudor, osservando che l’Ethereum in futuro supererà di fatto il Bitcoin. Per esempio, @minskmink87 ha scritto: „qualcuno gli ha detto che l’Ethereum avrà un tasso di inflazione più basso del Bitcoin tra qualche anno“. A tal fine, vale la pena di notare che una tale previsione potrebbe rivelarsi vera, dato che l’ETH 2.0 è impostato per ridurre al minimo il tasso di inflazione della moneta.

Prezzo del bitcoin e prezzo dell’etereum

Al momento della pubblicazione, Bitcoin era scambiato a 19.400,64 dollari, con un limite di mercato di 360.308.826.028 dollari e un volume di scambi di 24 ore di 24 ore di 24.226.611.914 dollari. In confronto, l’Ethereum è scambiato a 588,81 dollari, con un market cap di 67.019.364.466 dollari e un volume di trading 24 ore su 24 di 9.491.047.748 dollari.

BitTorrent will purchase the DLive streaming platform and create a single ecosystem.

The protocol company BitTorrent has announced plans to purchase a DLive streaming platform. The company intends to combine all related services into one BitTorrent X ecosystem.

According to the announcement, the new ecosystem will provide support in one infrastructure:

decentralized data storage (BTFS);
content distribution (BitTorrent);
video streaming (DLive).
All BitTorrent X services will be based on BTT token.

„BitTorrent X is the next step in creating a truly decentralized Internet,“ said Justin Sun, founder of Tron and CEO of BitTorrent.

TRON and BitTorrent plan to provide more detailed information about the future ecosystem during an interactive event in November.

In December 2019, DLive entered into a strategic partnership with BitTorrent, where it moved to Tron and integrated BTT.

Justin Sun acquired BitTorrent in 2018.

Recall that the author of the BitTorrent protocol, Bram Cohen, stated that he had just recently received most of the sum from Sun for the sale of the company, and it was less than agreed.